Legal Writing And Critical Legal Thinking

p MEMORANDUMTO :Mr . SmithFROMDATESUBJECT :Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA ) case________________________________________________________________________ ______FACTSMrs . Jones , a stomach physician of atomic number 20 , wishes to sue her employer , rigorous Company , for refusing to concession her quest for a medical medical exam set out of absence to sustenance for her conserve who was diagnosed with cancer . Her employer refused her take aim on the ground that she has been excessively take and that her request was non for the purpose of maternityISSUEWhether or not Mrs . Jones has adequate tholepinal leg to stand on to sue her employer for refusing to earmark her request for a medical leave of absence to treat for her husbandCONCLUSIONMrs .

Jones has enough buttocks to sue her employer for refusing to grant her request for medical leave to care for her husband who was diagnosed with cancerBoth the Family Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA ) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA ) kick in it un law of natureful for employers to refuse a request for family care and medical leave as provided in the actDISCUSSIONAssuming that Mrs . Jones met the requirements for length of service , the still questions left to be answered are whether the reason out for the leave being requested is covered by the law and whether the refusal of the employer to grant such request was justifiedThe case of Bond v . Abbott Laboratories (7 F .Supp .2d 967 , 1998 enumerated that elements to estab! lish a prima facie case on a lower floor the Family and Medical Leave Act...If you want to stupefy a panoptic essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper