'John Locke – Mind Essay\r'

'Hume and Locke’s conflicting views on the existence of private indistinguishability stem from a fundamental disagreement in regard to store. accord to Hume we have an impermanent ad hominem individualised individualism as a offspring of our constantly ever-changing swarm of perceptions. These mental experiences be usually triggered by ideas, or perceptions that involve a common sense experience. These constantly changing streams of perception form the false identity.\r\nOn the separate hand John Locke proposes this concept that says X has identity if the ideas of X cause an observer to have of x argon the same at different times. The opera hat cap fitting observer is X them self, as they argon there for every moment. For Locke all that is needed for personal identity is mental identity. Both these ideas of personal identity atomic number 18 intertwined with each respected philosopher’s views on memory. According to Hume, memory is unreliable. He believes projectivism tricks us into forming memories. This is unfeigned because Hume also says we can’t remember everything, precisely we project as if we do.\r\nThe reason he imposes this is because he believes it causes us to assume we are the same in our memories as we are promptly. Hume says our memories are triggered by ideas, or perceptions caused by thinking about an impression, instead of really experiencing it. These memories at best resemble one another, which means we confuse similar but different impressions of ourselves for an impression of a single unchanging self. Moreover, Hume says we do not have the same ideas as we do now and do in the past. As a result memory gives us false\r\nidentity with what it remembers. With this, the constitution of the human self is derived from these mental experiences. Although Hume maintains that personal identity is falsely assumed by humans, the ideas that arise from our memories are what forms one’s identity. The final e result of personal identity is that individuals have a false sense of identity, but that this false sense of identity is what gives them their individuality. This strong process is reliant upon memory; hence memory is crucial in the development of the false self and individuality.\r\nContrary to Hume, Locke believes memory is reliable. He insists that we are able to real recall the same memories. Similarly to Hume, Locke agrees we tire out’t remember everything. Although he shares this belief, he feels what we do remember is enough. He continues this assertion as he points out we don’t remember everything accurately but we remember enough accurately. In doing this, we are able to accurately recall past ideas and liken them with present ones. This is how he reaches his point that memory is reliable.\r\nSince our memories are reliable, our ideas in the past and the present can genuinely be the same. For Locke, the nature of the human self is effect through this p rocess of linking old memories to new memories to create similarities. Like Hume, individuality is obtained when this process is complete and with it comes consciousness of one’s self through time. opus Hume and Locke have very differentiating opinions on the conception of personal identity relative to memory, they both agree that the end result will be a strange individual.\r\n'