Legal Environment Essay

Sexual curse is always a legal subject bea in the work surround because the ramifications are so spartan, solely at the same time in truth abstract to describe what fecal matter pee informal curse. This paper will take into consideration different elements of the integrity of nature including Employment Law and depicted objects tried before the U. S. despotic address. It will in addition dourer suggestions for corrective action pertaining to the issue of sexual anguish in the work posterior. In corporate America, sexual bedevilment is a huge advert amongst m some(prenominal) organizations.The matter of sexual harassment is an issue that unavoidably to be immediately attended to in order for companies to avoid large be associated with lawsuits topicming from allegations of world sexually harassed in the workplace. Sexual harassment is comm save an immediate cost. gibe to Crucet et al. (2010), sexual harassment can cause damage to a companys representation, status, customers, as well as their issuance. Sexual harassment can be identified as any unwelcome sexual jesters or advances, request for sex, and/or any carnal or verbal conduct that may be considered in a sexual nature.The legalities circling sexual harassment can be broken batch into two particular categories. agree to Crucet et al. (2010), the first socio-economic class is spark plug professional quo and the second wholeness consists of a irrelevant environment. The first category of quid pro quo (this for that) sexual harassment usually involves an employee and a supervisor because in some situations only supervisors wealthy somebody the power of hiring and firing an employee. It withal involves some express or implied linkage between an employees endurance to sexually oriented fashion and tangible job consequences (Mallor et al. 2010, p. 1328). An example of quid pro quo could be related to a supervisor telling his womanhoodly employee that if you do this se xual favor for me, wherefore you will be promoted. jibe to Tyner & Clinton (2010), separate examples include managers requesting sexual favors, and the receipt or non-receipt of those favors as a condition for making hiring, destination, promotion, and other placement decisions. Quid pro quo is easier to place than hostile environment harassment. The second category of sexual harassment is called hostile environment harassment. According to Mallor et al. 2010), hostile environment harassment, occurs when an employee is subjected to unwelcome, sex-related behavior that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to change the conditions of the dupes employment and micturate an abusive works environment (p. 1328).The key element of any slip of harassment is unwelcomed sexual advances only in hostile environment harassment it is definitely a bit tricky and at times straining to define (Tyner & Clinton, 2010). Both categories of sexual harassment violate human action septette of Em ployment Law that is in place to protect equal probability in the workplace.In order to avoid or limit their financial obligation for sexual harassment allegations, an employer must act immediately when issues of sexual harassment are brought to their attention in addition to providing adequate training on sexual harassment along with having an effective policy in place that identifies the definition of sexual harassment. A current ethical situation that I view got encountered in the workplace involves hostile environment harassment. I befuddle an employee by the name of bobsled Doe that has been accused of sexual harassment in the workplace. wharfage has been working as an Admissions pleader under my lapse since January of 2011. bobsled is married with three young children between the ages of ten to sixteen. phellem is a great worker but people still detect uncomfortable around him and comes off much different that the other masculine employee or co worker. He carries arou nd an aura or shakiness that turn overs the pistillate employees go finished uncomfortable. For instance, when trail has a conversation with other womanly employees he tends to perk up too close and invade individualal space.He is often caught saying vulgar and raunchy remarks that are HR contradictory and has a habit of speaking under his breath a lot. some(prenominal) of the distaff employees have claimed that he stares at them for periods of time without saying anything. He is medium to tall height, with a muscular build and tends to wear near articles of clothing to reveal his muscles. go after is middle aged and is about 5-10 geezerhood older than the average of other Admissions Counselors. In August of 2011, one sidereal day other(prenominal) male employee approached me and give tongue to that Bob had made some remarks to him regarding a nonher female employee.Bob told this male employee that he would love to catch her rummy about that female employee. As a supervisor, this remark made me get hold very angry that one of my employees would make comments care that about a nonher employee and I immediately reported this action to my Director, Steve. Steve said that he rattling couldnt do anything about that comment because I could not realise whether or not he said it found off of the vocalize of another employee and that the comment was not heard by the female employee.The director then told me to stay away from the gossip in the workplace and not to get involved in drama, He reminded me that I am forecast to be above that sort of office slander and that I was grade in this position to make others people at their job and not be a whistle blower. I ac realiseledged what he told me and concur that I would do a better job moving forward, but I still asked him to please report this incident to Human Resources. Steve said that he would cut across the situation and would report the incident to Human Resources.Steve equivalents to go acrossle all HR issues as he calls, in house. Steve wants the managers to turn an incident by him before going to HR because he feels that he can handle the issues and that only if the cause was serious enough and if he was not present then we could go to Human Resources, otherwise we were to prove his approval or direction first. The second incident that involved Bob was in November 2011, when he approached another female employee on the team and grabbed her from hind end and hugged her.Although he was not being overly aggressive and had a smiling on his face, the female employee named Helen was caught off guard and felt violated and asked Bob not to touch her again because it made her feel uncomfortable. Bob laughed it off and said Gezz girl relax You know its not like that and pointed at his wedding ring and walk away. Helen approached me and told me what happened. I immediately pulled Bob into a conference room and told him very sternly that it was inappropriate to hug an d/or touch another employee in the workplace especially if it is unwelcomed because it could be viewed as sexual harassment.He said he understood and apologized for his behavior. At this time, I felt that this particular incident did not need to be reported to Human Resources since I felt I had a much or less good handle of the situation. I, however did document the incident in his employee military action log and mentioned it to my director who also said I handled the situation suitably The third incident that happened regarding Bob was in January 2012. Bob was flirting with a female employee named Lisa who was not an employee on my team but still in the same division. Bob then began to grab Lisas hand and stand it with his hand.As Lisa pulled away, she asked Bob why are you trying to hold my hand? Bobs response was youre so hot youre making my pass clammy. This was another sexual harassment issue that could have blown up. Once Lisas manager brought this situation to my at tention, I once again called Bob into the conference room and explained to him that this was his second warning not to touch another employee, especially a female employee because it is inappropriate and un presumable and if it were to happen again, then I would have no choice but to personally report him to Human Resources.Once again, I turned to my Director, Steve to examine his advice. Steve again told me that as long as you feel that you handled the situation fitly and documented it then Bob should be fine. At this point I started getting the feeling that Steve didnt care about the safety of my female employees and that he alone wanted to avoid HR to avoid a situation. I felt as if Steve was allowing this to happen to stay himself from looking bad. I then decide that I had to take the situation into my own hands and be more cognizant of Bobs behavior with other employees.There have been a number of other times that Bob continued to make inappropriate comments to other femal e employees. He would adulation girls on their dress and say how nice their legs looked or that a sure color really brings out their figure. However, there were no mo complaints from Bob in regards to touching another employee inappropriately. He eventually decided to spark onto another role with a different company and that was that. Sexual harassment is subjective because everyone identifies and perceives sexual harassment differently.Bob did come from the food and deglutition industry where he was a bartender and a lot of his employees were cocktail waitresses in a night club in downtown. He did mention that in his previous job that he was very friendly with his staff because the finis would be more tolerable, especially with alcohol being involved. So, he may not have viewed his actions as being sexual harassment to his female employees, but obviously the employees felt otherwise. Author Tyner and Clinton write that According to the law, the victim must be a commonsensical person (Tyner & Clinton, 2010).The reasonable person standard initiated in the landmark brass of Rabidue v. Osceola Refining back in 1986. According to Tyner & Clinton (2010), in this case the majority ruled that vulgar lyric poem and the sexually oriented posters did not result in a working environment that could be considered intimidating, hostile, or offensive under the guidelines. Essentially seek Keith felt that sexual harassment should not be judged by a reasonable person but rather by a reasonable victim (Tyner & Clinton, 2010).It is the victim that feels uncomfortable and is claiming the allegations of sexual harassment. They are the one that feel that the acts of another are unwelcomed and violating their legal righteousnesss. Unfortunately, as a manager of xiv Admissions Counselors, at times I dont have the straw man to be everywhere at all times. I have frequently not been present at urgent moments because I was helping or assisting another employee. I always mad e it a conscience social movement to praise in public and coach or criticize in private.This was the course of action I took with Bob whenever I witnessed an inappropriate behavior from him. I took him into the conference room and let me know that what he just did is not acceptable. I did not want him to feel that he was being discriminated against because he was an older male. I know that it was my ethical duty to make sure that all of my employees have the right to feel safe in the workplace. This topic really sticks out to me because as a manager of a big company we are constantly having sexual harassment trainings and seminars on how to identify and prevent instances from occurring.A manager at the training shared with the rest of the managers a horrific case of sexual harassment from one of her employees. The employees name was Tim and he was a very skilled and tenure Admissions Counselor and often looked at as a great example of a successful hard working Admissions Counselor . When a female new need Kristy was added onto the same team as Tim the manager advised that the new hire learn from Tim and create best practices and habits that Tim has. Kristy was near Tim a lot because she was attached orders to learn from Tim.Tim would use this opportunity to flirt with Kristy constantly and asking her very intruding read/write heads about her personal life such as, if she is dating anyone or if she is interested in a relationship or just claw up. Kristy became very ucomfortable when Tim started to text message her at night saying that he is bored now that he is divorced and that he wants to meet her other(a) in the morning to go over performance strategies. When Kristy finally confided in another employee the manager was brought to attention.The manager immediately told Kristy to go to HR right away and the manager went to her supervisor and they both took immediate actions. Because of Tims behavior Kristy was about to quit her job and she would attempt to be sick in order to stay away from Tims desk. Tims behavior created a hostile environment because Kristy was in fear of encountering Tim. This incident not only saddens me for Kristy, but also made me sad because of what Bob had done in the past to my fellow employees and I had not taken immediate actions like I should have.Legal Viewpoints The U. S. domineering Court According to Crucet et al. (2010), in 1980 the Supreme Court said that sexual harassment was a breach of the well-behaved Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in hiring, firing, job assignments, pay, access to training, and apprenticeship programs, and most other employment decisions (Mallor et al. , 2010, p. 1323). An chief(prenominal) case that first appeared the reasonable person argument was in the Rabidue v. Osceola Refining in 1986 mentioned earlier in this paper.This case is often cited as the predec essor to the landmark Supreme Court case of Ellison v. Brady in 1991. In Ellison v. Brady (1991) the Supreme Court rules that it is unreasonable to use a reasonable person standard since the rules were established by men (Tyner & Clinton, 2010). This is where the reasonable victim came into existence. The court went on to say that we note that the reasonable woman victim standard we adopt today classified conduct as unlawful sexual harassment even when harassers do not get word that their conduct creates a hostile working environment (Tyner & Clinton, 2010).This Supreme Court ruling is of great importance. Many of times, harassers dont even suck in what they are doing is wrong because their perception of reality is off. Two important Supreme Court cases in 1998 created the framework for deciding whether or not employers were held apt for sexual harassment committed by its employees. The first was Burlington Industries v. Ellerth (1998) and the second was Farragher v. Boca Raton ( 1998). According to Cabassa (2011), employers in jurisdictions where courts have allowed indemnity claims against employees for actions giving rise to harassment cases are on the rise.There are many cases linking to sexual harassment in the workplace that they have launched a litigation committee that covers employment law to covering all legal issues related to the employment relationship (Cabassa, 2010). The interrogate still stands on whether or not a company is apt for sexual harassment committed by one of its employees. The answer to that question lies on whether the harasser was a coemployee or a supervisor of the victim, whether the victim suffered tangible job detriment and whether the company had sexual harassment policies, training, and score procedures (Mallor et al. , 2010, p. 1328).Therefore, in order for a company to release themselves from association and allegations of sexual harassment a number of things need to be considered. Suggestions for Corrective effect A ccording to Das (2007), sexualization itself, as a precursor to signaling, could arguably stem both from a targets developmental trajectory and from later-life experiences that get layered onto this basal personality substrate. Therefore, although Bob had these precursor straits of sexualization prior to him going through divorce, the later-life experiences of divorce layered into his life may have caused him to be more relentless.Regardless of his personal life experiences, Bob needs to be in line with the Employee Handbook and follow its policies. It is imperative each company have a Human Resource or Employees Relations Representative that can handle any allegations of sexual harassment. It is first and foremost important for a company no matter of size small or large, to have an Employee Handbook in place to identify what is considered acceptable and what can be recognized as sexual harassment. Then adequate training needs to be in place to help identify what may be considered as sexual and/or ostile environment harassment.After the training, each employee should be required to sign off on an acknowledgment form acknowledging that they know and understand the sexual harassment policy. Once those guidelines are set then it is important for managers and supervisors to take the allegations of sexual harassment very seriously and prevent any further occurrences to take place. If allegations of sexual harassment are made, it is important for Human Resources to open an investigation immediately to determine the facts of the case and to get each sides of the story.Once the pieces of the puzzle are in place, then the attached step is to take appropriate disciplinary action up to and including termination of the harasser. This measure will hopefully prevent sexual and hostile environment harassment.Conclusion In conclusion, the Employment Law has been established by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 allowing every person the right to occupy a career and economic gain with the absence of sexual harassment in the workplace. The U. S.Supreme Court has been a huge help in identifying the law surrounding and interpreting the U. S. Constitution as it pertains to sexual harassment. According to Tyner & Clinton (2010), the Society for Human Resource Managers reported in 2002 that 97 percent of employers have written sexual harassment policies and that 62 percent of those employers get out training on sexual harassment. Therefore, as a society we are on the right track to preventing harassment of any type in the workplace especially unwelcomed and unwarranted sexual advances.