To What Extent Does the State Protect the Rights of Children Essay

To What Extent Does the State Protect the Rights of Children - screen ExampleFor there is no hesitation that since its modern emergence as a well-disposed problem, baby abuse has been subject to considerable media, public and political interest and discussion. It has been constructed as one of the major social problems of present times and perhaps the major priority for managers and practitioners in the barbarian welf be field. Child egis work, by which we mean protection from the risk of abuse, has become too centred on the occurrence or not of an abusive event and the likelihood of its recurrence. Here one has to consider two scenarios. The first scenario is that in the former, insurance policy and practice would be driven by an emphasis on partnership, participation, prevention, family support and a positive consider of the purposes and uses of care. The main concern would be on helping parents and children in the community in a accessory way and would keep notions of poli cing, surveillance and coercive noises to a minimum. In effect, Part III and Section 17 of the turn of events would drive policy and practice. The other scenario was that it would be priorities about child protection which would control in effect Part V and Section 47 in particular, and concerns about the threshold for state intervention based on significant harm and the likelihood of significant harm. Not only are the family support aspirations and sections of the Act being implemented partially and not prioritised, but also the child protection system is overladen and not coping with the increased demands made of it. While child protection is the dominating concern and this is chassis child welfare more generally, increasingly it is felt that too many cases are being dragged into the child protection net and that as a consequence the few who might require such interventions are in danger of being missed. (Landsberg, 2001) Concerns about child protection have become all-pervasiv e to the point where child care and child welfare policies and priorities have been fundamentally re-ordered and re-fashioned in its guise. What we are currently witnessing is a major statement about whether and how policy and practice can be reframed so that it is consistent with the original intentions of the Children Act 1989.